Names and Labels
Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Recently I've come to appreciate how important names and labels can be. It's much easier to ignore a phenomenon if it has no name. I suspect that's one reason why the Small Giants phenomenon -- that is, companies choosing to be great instead of big -- has been ignored up to now: It hasn't had a name.

These thoughts come to mind as a result of a meeting the staff of Inc. had last Friday with Timothy Faley and Mary Nickson of the Zell Institute for Entrepreneurial Studies, which is affiliated with the Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. We naturally began discussing the different types entrepreneurial companies. Dr. Faley explained that the institute was formed to leverage the University's enormous research base and thus focused on the fast-growing, venture-backed companies. He and Ms. Nickson noted that there were programs at community colleges to support people who wanted to start restaurants, salons, clothing stores, and the like. What about other types of entrepreneurial businesses? we asked. They said that they also saw people who wanted to have lifestyle businesses.

That is, in fact, the way most people have divided up the world of private companies during the past 25 years. We've had the fast-growing, venture-backed gazelles; the stereotypical small businesses; the lifestyle businesses -- and that has been about it. In retrospect, it's clear to me that, in the process, we overlooked a large and important class of entrepreneurial companies, namely, those that aspire to be the best at what they do but that aren't interested in getting as big as possible. They don't force growth. They let it come to them. What drives them is the desire to contribute something great to the world. They regard financial success not as the goal, but as a byproduct of having great products and services, of cultivating great relationships with their customers and suppliers, providing a great place for people to work, and being a great corporate citizen. They are, in other words, the Small Giants.

My fondest hope is that, by giving the phenomenon a name, we will help to make visible a part of the economy that has remained invisible for far too long. I also hope we will provide people just starting out in business with a new goal worth striving for.

3 Comments:

Blogger Sean said...

I found the naming process very useful. What surprised me most of all, was the identification of the 'external forces'. As you rightly mentioned, as you're growing, 'external forces' encourage, even pressurise you to grow faster.

Our business has trundled along for a while, but now clients are asking for trainers, for additional products and services. In other words, a bigger investment in time and resources.

And it was good to isolate the concept of pressure, so we could say, "Hey, we don't need this right now!" And grow steadily, instead of in big spurts.

Sean
http://www.psychotactics.com

3:08 AM

 
Blogger Sean said...

The other really useful point was the take off from 'Good to Great.' Jim Collins' hedgehog label can confuse greatness with size--especially since most of the examples are really big companies.

But greatness and size are not really one and the same. Easy to say, but hard to comprehend, and the 'great factor' can be easily lost in the quest for size.

Now Jim doesn't actually mention size. In some of his audios, he actually plays down the size factor. What 'Small Giants' does however, is underline the 'greatness' factor alongside the 'small' factor. And that alone means that entrepreneurs around the world will be breathing a big sigh of relief.

Sean
http://www.psychotactics.com

3:16 AM

 
Anonymous Daniel Chambers said...

Thank you so much for giving a name and form to exactly what we are trying to do with our brand new company. I spent the last decade getting experience, learning, moving from position to position and using it all to define what it was we did NOT want to do when we started our own company.

It has been a struggle to define why we avoid VC's and why we focus so tight that we will have to stay small...or it was a struggle unitl your book. I just finished the introduction and got so excited I had to hop online to say thank you.

So, thank you!

Please blog some more or at least let us know if you are acively continuing this concept in the pages of Inc.. Thank you again for giving voice to this movement.

All the best,

Dan

9:15 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home